[Analysis of chest imaging features of novel coronavirus pneumonia, bacterial pneumonia and viral pneumonia].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate and summarize the chest CT imaging features of patients with novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19), bacterial pneumonia and other viral pneumonia. METHODS: Chest CT data of 102 patients with pulmonary infection due to different etiologies were retrospectively analyzed, including 36 patients with COVID-19 admitted to Hainan Provincial People's Hospital and the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University from December 2019 to March 2020, 16 patients with other viral pneumonia admitted to Hainan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2018 to February 2020, and 50 patients with bacterial pneumonia admitted to Haikou Affiliated Hospital of Central South University Xiangya School of Medicine from April 2018 to May 2020. Two senior radiologists and two senior intensive care physicians were participated to evaluated the extent of lesions involvement and imaging features of the first chest CT after the onset of the disease. RESULTS: Bilateral pulmonary lesions were more common in patients with COVID-19 and other viral pneumonia, and the incidence was significantly higher than that of bacterial pneumonia (91.6%, 75.0% vs. 26.0%, P < 0.05). Compared with other viral pneumonia and COVID-19, bacterial pneumonia was mainly characterized by single-lung and multi-lobed lesion (62.0% vs. 18.8%, 5.6%, P < 0.05), accompanied by pleural effusion and lymph node enlargement. The proportion of ground-glass opacity in the lung tissues of patients with COVID-19 was 97.2%, that of patients with other viral pneumonia was 56.2%, and that of patients with bacterial pneumonia was only 2.0% (P < 0.05). The incidence rate of lung tissue consolidation (25.0%, 12.5%), air bronchial sign (13.9%, 6.2%) and pleural effusion (16.7%, 37.5%) in patients with COVID-19 and other viral pneumonia were significantly lower than those in patients with bacterial pneumonia (62.0%, 32.0%, 60.0%, all P < 0.05), paving stone sign (22.2%, 37.5%), fine mesh sign (38.9%, 31.2%), halo sign (11.1%, 25.0%), ground-glass opacity with interlobular septal thickening (30.6%, 37.5%), bilateral patchy pattern/rope shadow (80.6%, 50.0%) etc. were significantly higher than those of bacterial pneumonia (2.0%, 4.0%, 2.0%, 0%, 22.0%, all P < 0.05). The incidence of local patchy shadow in patients with COVID-19 was only 8.3%, significantly lower than that in patients with other viral pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia (8.3% vs. 68.8%, 50.0%, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of peripheral vascular shadow thickening in patients with COVID-19, other viral pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia (27.8%, 12.5%, 30.0%, P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The probability of ground-glass opacity, paving stone and grid shadow in chest CT of patients with COVID-19 was significantly higher than those of bacterial pneumonia, and it was more common in the lower lungs and lateral dorsal segment. In other patients with viral pneumonia, ground-glass opacity was distributed in both upper and lower lungs. Bacterial pneumonia is usually characterized by single lung consolidation, distributed in lobules or large lobes and accompanied by pleural effusion.

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ivarmacitinib (SHR0302) in Adult Patients with Moderate to Severe Alopecia Areata.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is a CD8+ T cell mediated autoimmune disease characterized by non-scarring hair loss. Ivarmacitinib, a selective oral Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor, may interrupt certain cytokine signaling implicated in the pathogenesis of AA. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivarmacitinib in adult AA patients who have ≥25% scalp hair loss. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive ivarmacitinib 2 mg, 4 mg, or 8 mg QD or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage change from baseline in Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were randomized. At week 24, the least squares mean (LSM) difference in percentage change from baseline in SALT score for ivarmacitinib 2 mg,4 mg, 8 mg, and placebo groups were -30.51% (90% confidence interval [CI]: -45.25, -15.76), -56.11% (90% CI: -70.28, -41.95), -51.01% (90% CI: -65.20, -36.82) and -19.87% (90% CI: -33.99, -5.75), respectively. Two SAEs, follicular lymphoma, and COVID-19 pneumonia were reported. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size limits the generalizability of the results. CONCLUSION: Treatment with ivarmacitinib 4 mg and 8 mg doses in moderate and severe AA patients for 24 weeks was efficacious and generally tolerated.

Study on the clinical features and prognosis of second and third generations of COVID-19.

Background: There have been no studies examining differences in clinical manifestations and prognosis between second and third generation coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Our object was to analyze the epidemiological data and correlation between clinical types and COVID-19 generations. Methods: Older than 18 years COVID-19 patients who met two of the three items listed in COVID-19 Diagnosis Protocol were enrolled and divided into two groups based on epidemiological history. Clinical characteristics (age, gender, body mass index, course), disease severity, laboratory results (platelets, white blood cells, lymphocytes, inflammatory biomarkers, alanine aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase, myoglobin, troponin, D-dimer blood biochemical indexes), clinical types were analyzed. Two groups were compared by chi-square test, group means were compared by t test, correlation between COVID-19 generations and clinical severity and clinical types were examined by Spearman correlation analysis. Results: There were no significant differences in gender composition (P=0.488), A-DROP scores (P=0.079) nor BMI (P=0.532) between the two generations. The number of second generation patients over 60 years was significantly greater than that in third generation (P<0.001). Creatine kinase levels of third generation patients were significantly higher than those of second generation patients at admission (P=0.009) and during hospitalization (P=0.023). The troponin levels of third generation patients were significantly higher than those of second generation patients at admission (P=0.020). At discharged, the creatine kinase and troponin levels were not significantly different between the two generations. Rate of severe (P=0.130) and critical cases (P=0.314) in second generation COVID-19 patients was not significantly different from that of third generation patients. Age (ρ=0.224, P<0.001), duration (ρ=0.317, P<0.001), transmission generation (ρ=0.269, P<0.001), serum creatine kinase (ρ=0.240, P<0.001), troponin (ρ=0.296, P<0.001), C-reaction protein (ρ=0.278, P<0.001), procalcitonin levels (ρ=0.221, P=0.001), lymphocyte count (ρ=-0.245, P<0.001), and platelet count (ρ=-0.265, P<0.001) of COVID-19 patients were significantly s correlated with clinical types. Conclusions: Increased virulence may occur in specific tissues and organs during intergenerational transmission of COVID-19 virus. COVID-19 virus virulence in different regions is different. The clinical prognosis of COVID-19 patients is closely related to age, course, transmission generations, and some laboratory indicators. Transmission generation, regional differences, and laboratory indicators may have certain potential value in predicting prognosis and treatment.

Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Virus Using Dual Reverse Transcriptional Colorimetric Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification.

The outbreak and pandemic of COVID-19, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has developed into a public health emergency of international concern. The rapid and accurate detection of the virus is a critical means to prevent and control the disease. Herein, we provide a novel, rapid, and simple approach, named dual reverse transcriptional colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (dRT-cLAMP) assay, to accelerate the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus without using expensive equipment. The result of this assay is shown by color change and is easily detected by the naked eye. To improve the detection accuracy, we included two primer sets that specifically target the viral orf1ab and N genes in the same reaction mixture. Our assay can detect the synthesized SARS-CoV-2 N and orf1ab genes at a low level of 100 copies/µL. Sequence alignment analysis of the two synthesized genes and those of 9968 published SARS-CoV-2 genomes and 17 genomes of other pathogens from the same infection site or similar symptoms as COVID-19 revealed that the primers for the dRT-cLAMP assay are highly specific. Our assay of 27 clinical samples of SARS-CoV-2 virus and 27 standard-added environmental simulation samples demonstrated that compared to the commercial kits, the consistency of the positive, negative, and probable clinical samples was 100, 92.31, and 44.44%, respectively. Moreover, our results showed that the positive, but not negative, standard-added samples displayed a naked-eye-detectable color change. Together, our results demonstrate that the dRT-cLAMP assay is a feasible detection assay for SARS-CoV-2 virus and is of great significance since rapid onsite detection of the virus is urgently needed at the ports of entry, health care centers, and for internationally traded goods.

Consensus of Chinese experts on protection of skin and mucous membrane barrier for health-care workers fighting against coronavirus disease 2019.

Health professions preventing and controlling Coronavirus Disease 2019 are prone to skin and mucous membrane injury, which may cause acute and chronic dermatitis, secondary infection and aggravation of underlying skin diseases. This is a consensus of Chinese experts on protective measures and advice on hand-cleaning- and medical-glove-related hand protection, mask- and goggles-related face protection, UV-related protection, eye protection, nasal and oral mucosa protection, outer ear, and hair protection. It is necessary to strictly follow standards of wearing protective equipment and specification of sterilizing and cleaning. Insufficient and excessive protection will have adverse effects on the skin and mucous membrane barrier. At the same time, using moisturizing products is highly recommended to achieve better protection.